Skip to content

Westchester Board of Legislators Meeting – Speak Out About AIM & Indian Point

August 9, 2015

Tomorrow at 10:00am

148 Martine Ave. 8th Floor, White Plains, NY

Created for Stop the Algonquin Pipeline Expansion (SAPE)
Please help protect the health and safety of more than 20 million people in the NY metro area!

Urgent Action Needed!
Please share widely!
Please attend the full legislature meeting of the Westchester County Board of Legislators this Monday morning, August 10th at 10 am at 148 Martine Avenue, White Plains on the 8th floor. Sign up to speak at public comment session starts at 9 am.
Press Conference at 9:30 am on outside steps at front of the building on Martine Avenue. Be sure to have ID to present at security desk.

Bringing this emergent matter to the attention of the full Westchester County legislature and the press is of utmost importance. You are urgently needed to convey the following message to the legislature in the strongest possible terms.

Please speak up and tell the Westchester County legislature on Monday morning that the County should NOT be moving forward with signing of a license agreement that will enable Spectra Energy to move forward with the Algonquin Incremental Market (AIM) pipeline project in view of very dangerous situation that has come to light with the new disclosure of internal documents from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Here’s why it’s so important that you attend and speak up:

Precious time is running out. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is expected to issue the Notice to Proceed to Spectra Energy in a matter of weeks in order to begin construction of the AIM pipeline next to Indian Point despite the fact that there are numerous grave concerns about the defective Entergy and NRC risk analyses. Westchester County Executive Astorino is poised to sign a license agreement in the next few weeks granting significant acreage in the county’s Blue Mountain Reservation to Spectra, a key element needed to enable the AIM pipeline expansion project to proceed.

According to pipeline and nuclear safety experts the siting of the pipeline adjacent to Indian Point could cause a scenario similar to the Fukushima nuclear disaster, where plant operators were unable to cool reactors and spent fuel pools due to a loss of all power. The nuclear power and pipeline safety experts have been insisting that a thorough, independent and transparent risk assessment which includes a transient analysis is imperative but was never done. Westchester County legislature resolutions have also called for comprehensive, independent health and risk assessments.

New information obtained in FOIA documents from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shows:

~NRC used falsified information to justify its conclusion that there is no additional risk posed by the siting of the AIM gas pipeline adjacent to the Indian Point nuclear facility.
~NRC knowingly used improper calculations that significantly underestimate the danger, do not comply with its own regulations, and defy the laws of pipeline thermodynamics.
~NRC used handwritten, unsigned, undated, falsified calculations to claim that this massive high-pressure natural gas pipeline only 105 feet from vital structures at Indian Point will pose no additional threat.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of the AIM pipeline project was based on this false information. Had the NRC used accurate information and correct methodology concerning the dynamics of a pipeline rupture, the blast impact radius would be significantly larger and the siting of the pipeline alongside Indian Point would most certainly not have been approved.

According to the leading national pipeline expert, Rick Kuprewicz,”it appears the permitting agencies are attempting to take advantage of a loophole that permits the NRC to dismiss risks if such analysis can be categorized below a certain threshold value, while ignoring the severe consequences that might prevent the nuke plant to safely shutdown.” Kuprewicz further states, “Agency studies create the appearance of risk management tampering to favor a project agency decision and raise the question, Are involved agencies capable of performing a scientifically neutral study for such a sensitive issue?” “A truly independent safety analysis should be performed, subject to a reasonable open peer review. Security claims should not be permitted to shelter malfeasance in a scientific method involving incomplete risk analysis for such a highly sensitive infrastructure.”

Thank you for making every effort to attend the press conference at 9:30 am and sign up
at 9 am to speak for 3 minutes at the 10 am County Board of Legislators meeting this Monday morning, August 10th.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: